- Adobe Premiere Pro Cs6 Update
- Adobe Premiere Pro Cs6 Vs Final Cut X Tutorial
- Adobe Premiere Pro Cs6 Vs Final Cut X Trial
The Adobe Premiere Pro vs Final Cut Pro is always in the rat race, fighting to achieve the number one position and rule the heart of their users and subscribers. It is because Premier and Final Cut are the only two video editing software for the macOS. How professional editors select Final Cut Pro X or Adobe Premiere Pro X to edit their videosFind out more about CleanMyMac X http://bit.ly/cleanmymacstalmanL. Between Adobe's Premiere Pro and Apple's Final Cut Pro X software, Final Cut Pro X edges slightly ahead due to its ease of use and quick rendering of video and effects footage. The other advantage of Apple's solution is price and not having to invest in a monthly subscription payment, as is necessary with Premiere Pro.
Apple Final Cut ProX vs Adobe Premiere Pro
Both Final Cut Pro X and Premier Pro are popular video editing software and available as an element of larger software bundles. Till the launch of Final Cut Pro X in 2011, FCP was regarded as premium application or professional's choice. Presently Adobe Premier Pro is also gaining a little space among video editing professionals.
Being an video editing institute we have some thoughts to share here to help new comers. Few points are being given below for the comparison. Hope you will like.
Options | Final Cut Pro X (FCP) | Premier Pro |
| Cross Platform/ Operating System | Video Editing projects require high configuration computers to work on so Final Cut Pro X runs only on Mac OS. Every one knows about the performance of Apple's Computers. | While Premiere Pro runs on Mac OS X and Windows workstations too. |
| Suite versus 'suite' | FCP is the only software available through the Mac App Store. | Premier Pro is purchased as a part of Production Premium or as creative Cloud subscription or as Master collection software bundles. |
| Plug-ins | FCP has no plug-in architecture. | Whereas the Premiere Pro has weak plug-in architecture. |
| Organizational tools | FCP X encompasses huge library of organizational tools for quick & automatic organization of media such as keywords, rating, camera, textual metadata, etc. | Premier Pro has limited organizational tool when compared to FCPX. |
| User Interface Configurations | FCP X has smooth interface design based on panels and windows. | While premiere pro works on a system of dockable tabs common across allied Adobe's applications. |
| Tracks vs Trackless | FCP X doesn't work on tracks. It uses clips according to storylines & connected clips. | It uses traditional track based timeline structure. |
| Projects & Clip Management | FCP X divides it structure into Events and Projects. | Whereas Premiere Pro creates a single, self-contained data file for each edit edited project. |
| Media Management | Presently FCP doesn't support any clip trimming or media management. | Premiere pro allows clip trimming through its Project Manager tool. |
| List interchange | Supports data interchange with external applications only. | It supports XML, EDL, OMF and AAF. |
| Pricing & Openness | FCP X is cheap even after adding more applications & plug-in. Fact being a Mac App Store product. | When compared with FCP, premier pro is an expensive application. |
Above few points show that if you are looking for stable and cheaper option than go for the Apple FCP. Apple FCP requires one time investment while Adobe Premiere is really very costly option. The main problem comes when you go for Apple FCP then you must have an Apple computer to run it on. It is little costly but as I told you that choosing Apple FCP platform means stable, time saving, and money saving option for you. But if you are looking for a short time video editing project's setup or you don't have money to buy Apple's Computer then Adobe Premiere might be a good choice for you because you can go for Adobe's monthly subscription plan to use their application.
Note:
1. Apple provides perpetual license that can be used lifetime while Adobe's licensing policy is subscription based just like an antivirus or mobile recharge. Think yourself what suits to you, that would be your final decision.
2. If you want to learn any one from these two video editing softwares than you have to pay even more than double for Adobe Premier Training than the Apple FCP because of the Premiere's heavy licensing cost.
Hope you liked and enjoyed.
Screenshot windows 10 mobile. Please leave your feedback in comments.
Thanks
Related Posts:
Make Your Career in Video Editing and Broadcasting
Final Cut Pro Training Institutes in Delhi
How ADMEC's Software Courses Helps Professional Photographers?
Visual Effects– Promising a Bright Future
Cover image via
Deciding between Adobe Creative Cloud, Final Cut Pro X and Avid for pro video editing? Here are a few thoughts and opinions to help you make that call.
Adobe Premiere Pro Cs6 Update
As a decade-long loyal and faithful FCP editor, the time seems to be coming of the true death of FCP7. When you start to encounter workflow slowdowns and workarounds that would not otherwise be needed when working in up-to-date applications, it feels like it's time to start looking around at other options.
The options are still basically what they were five years ago — Apple, Avid, and Adobe. But while that hasn't changed, other things have. Final cut pro for windows 7 price.
Apple dropped the FCPX launch so spectacularly it is still embedded in the popular consciousness (even though FCPX has come a long way since then). Adobe is freaking people out with their Cloud move. And Media Composer is chugging along, (possibly with company-wide financial difficulties), but is still seen by many as the only choice for large institution-sized outfits.
There have been many discussions online and off in the last two years about the merits of Final Cut Pro X versus other video editing applications. This post is not intended to prove which video editing system is the best, but rather look at considerations of each and how it may affect your choice of primary application.
So, what is an editor to do?
Well my first thought would be to download the free trial of each app, cut something on it, and see how you go. Googling articles like this one probably won't supply you with the information you're really after — what's it like to actually use the video editing program? However, articles like this one can supply you with other useful information and resources, so do keep reading!
Budget: Premiere Pro vs. Final Cut Pro X vs. Avid Media Composer
Adobe Premiere Pro Cs6 Vs Final Cut X Tutorial
If you're a cost-conscious creative, then what does the scenario look like? Avid Media Composer is now available for a steady $999 and comes with Sorenson Squeeze thrown in. You pay once and you can keep it forever. Avid are still releasing free point patches for old versions, and upgrading between versions will cost you a small fee (the upgrade from Media Composer version 6.5 to 7 is $299).
The cost of Final Cut Pro X, purchased via the Mac App Store, is only $299.99. Motion 5 and Compressor 4 are both $49.99. Again, you get to keep the software for as long as you like and (so far) all of the updates to FCPX have been free.
Adobe currently has two options available. Buy a suite of software like Production Premium CS6 for $1899 or move to the Creative Cloud versions for $49.99 a month. With Adobe CC, you've got access to every single Adobe application, plus 2GB of online storage. So, how does that shake out in the long run?
If you bought Production Premium CS 6 and kept it for three years it would cost you $1899. $49.99 a month for three years is $1,799.64.
If you only want one application like After Effects CS6 ($999), Photoshop CS6 ($699) or Premiere Pro CS6 ($799) as a single app, CC rental ($19.99/month) after three years that would be $719.64.
In product development terms, even three years is a long time. So if Adobe does not increase their monthly prices, and this quote from VP of Professional Business in Adobe's Digital Media Business Unit Mala Sharma seems to try to allay those fears, then moving to the Cloud could save you a few bucks and keep you up to date.
My only rational response to that is that we can't [push up prices]… It's in our best interests to win our customers' trust – as every month they're going to be choosing whether they want to stay engaged with us or not. We have never been more vulnerable, in my opinion, than in [moving to a subscription model]. It's a really big bet.
But Adobe's Creative Cloud is still more expensive than either of the other two competing video editing options (though that's not a fair direct comparison when you consider the number of applications involved).
Well my first thought would be to download the free trial of each app, cut something on it, and see how you go. Googling articles like this one probably won't supply you with the information you're really after — what's it like to actually use the video editing program? However, articles like this one can supply you with other useful information and resources, so do keep reading!
Budget: Premiere Pro vs. Final Cut Pro X vs. Avid Media Composer
Adobe Premiere Pro Cs6 Vs Final Cut X Tutorial
If you're a cost-conscious creative, then what does the scenario look like? Avid Media Composer is now available for a steady $999 and comes with Sorenson Squeeze thrown in. You pay once and you can keep it forever. Avid are still releasing free point patches for old versions, and upgrading between versions will cost you a small fee (the upgrade from Media Composer version 6.5 to 7 is $299).
The cost of Final Cut Pro X, purchased via the Mac App Store, is only $299.99. Motion 5 and Compressor 4 are both $49.99. Again, you get to keep the software for as long as you like and (so far) all of the updates to FCPX have been free.
Adobe currently has two options available. Buy a suite of software like Production Premium CS6 for $1899 or move to the Creative Cloud versions for $49.99 a month. With Adobe CC, you've got access to every single Adobe application, plus 2GB of online storage. So, how does that shake out in the long run?
If you bought Production Premium CS 6 and kept it for three years it would cost you $1899. $49.99 a month for three years is $1,799.64.
If you only want one application like After Effects CS6 ($999), Photoshop CS6 ($699) or Premiere Pro CS6 ($799) as a single app, CC rental ($19.99/month) after three years that would be $719.64.
In product development terms, even three years is a long time. So if Adobe does not increase their monthly prices, and this quote from VP of Professional Business in Adobe's Digital Media Business Unit Mala Sharma seems to try to allay those fears, then moving to the Cloud could save you a few bucks and keep you up to date.
My only rational response to that is that we can't [push up prices]… It's in our best interests to win our customers' trust – as every month they're going to be choosing whether they want to stay engaged with us or not. We have never been more vulnerable, in my opinion, than in [moving to a subscription model]. It's a really big bet.
But Adobe's Creative Cloud is still more expensive than either of the other two competing video editing options (though that's not a fair direct comparison when you consider the number of applications involved).
Adobe Premiere Pro Cs6 Vs Final Cut X Trial
Common Opinions
The Internet is awash with opinions on whether or not to move to the Creative Cloud — just check out the number of comments each of these articles has generated. Oliver Peters, who's usually right on the money, offer this cautious recommendation:
My suggestion for most users in similar shoes would be to buy one of the CS6 bundles now as a perpetual license. This gives you a fallback position. Then if you want to move forward with the Cloud, run the numbers. If you are a power user of Photoshop, Premiere Pro or After Effects and want to have the latest version of that one application, simply buy a single-application subscription. If you use three or more applications on a regular basis and want those all to be current, then the full Creative Cloud subscription makes sense. You still have the CS6 versions if needed, as long as you've maintain backwards project compatibility.
Aharon Rabinowitz has written a couple of excellent blog posts (Part 1 and Part 2) that cover his opinions, interactions with Adobe, and his readers' thoughts. It's worth reading through the blog posts (if not all the comments), as Rabinowitz covers quite a few of the common concerns creatives are raising.
Jahron Schneider from Fstoppers also walks through the Adobe Creative Cloud maze and comes out in favor of it:
If the software and delivery of that software makes your life easier, it's a good thing right? That's what you should focus on when contemplating the Creative Cloud, because it does make your life easier. I'm comfortable saying that the Creative Cloud is better for Adobe and better for the consumers. It's a great service, and one I'll continue to use.
For a short video covering the major new features in Adobe CC (and a few extra thoughts on the future of FCPX), check out this post-NAB 2013 comparison between FCPX and Adobe CC.
What About the Future of Final Cut Pro X?
A lot of pros still claim FCPX is unusable, and although the Coen Brothers might be moving to Premiere for their next feature, plenty of other folks are cutting 4K feature films in FCPX. Apple is working hard to frequently update FCPX, and with the growth of third party apps, more and more one-man-band operations are embracing the affordable app.
One of the people who has shared their FCPX workflow in detail is Sam Mestman. If you want to see FCPX with fresh eyes, check out his presentation below.
As a quick nod to Avid Media Composer 7, you can check out the official MC7 site listing all the new features from Avid and also this quick round up from NAB 2013. Android to xbox one stream.
As the FCPX launch proved, things in this industry can change quickly and dramatically. Knowing every system well has distinct advantages. If you're a one-man band or small post house, you'll want to choose a video editing application and stick with it for a few years.
Which NLE is your favorite and why? Share your opinions and experiences in the comments below!
